|
Post by wtiger on Oct 26, 2017 11:18:34 GMT -6
I have heard that a class b/c student could play at the school in the parish that has football, but still be enrolled at the class b/c school. I looked in the handbook, but didn't see that. Does anyone know of that is true? Thanks
|
|
|
Post by LATigerFan on Oct 26, 2017 11:22:28 GMT -6
He can enroll at the school that has football and play but he cant attend one school and play football at another.
|
|
|
Post by wtiger on Oct 26, 2017 11:43:01 GMT -6
He can enroll at the school that has football and play but he cant attend one school and play football at another. Thanks, I thought what I was told was odd.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2017 11:58:14 GMT -6
In some cases they can stay at old school, but play at another. Like LSMSA students can play at Natchitoches Central or St Mary's, but stay at LSMSA.
|
|
|
Post by wildcat on Oct 26, 2017 13:20:49 GMT -6
is this a LHSAA decision or is it one that is left up to individual parishes and school boards?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 26, 2017 13:54:55 GMT -6
It depends on if the school offers sports. At LaSAS in Bunkie you can play sports at your home school and attend LaSAS.
|
|
|
Post by pinion on Oct 26, 2017 20:08:22 GMT -6
If that happens, they should make the school that has the footballer select.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2017 7:48:35 GMT -6
If that happens, they should make the school that has the footballer select. Disagree...they can't "select" whether or not to take the kid. If he wants to come he comes...even if he's horrible at football, and brings down the sps. I don't agree with letting kids play at a school they don't attend in general though. Including home schoolers.
|
|
|
Post by iknownuthing on Oct 27, 2017 9:05:02 GMT -6
If that happens, they should make the school that has the footballer select. Disagree...they can't "select" whether or not to take the kid. If he wants to come he comes...even if he's horrible at football, and brings down the sps. I don't agree with letting kids play at a school they don't attend in general though. Including home schoolers. This is what you call hair splitting. You can define it any way you wish but if a private school who offers football such as Highland Baptist were to allow kids from Assembly Christian two doors down to play on their team, you would all be screaming bloody murder cheater recruiter......
|
|
|
Post by iknownuthing on Oct 27, 2017 9:06:17 GMT -6
If that happens, they should make the school that has the footballer select. Absolutely.
|
|
|
Post by wildcat on Oct 27, 2017 9:12:14 GMT -6
If that happens, they should make the school that has the footballer select. Absolutely. But wouldn't they have to meet a 10% quota or some number like that before they are deemed select?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2017 9:50:52 GMT -6
Disagree...they can't "select" whether or not to take the kid. If he wants to come he comes...even if he's horrible at football, and brings down the sps. I don't agree with letting kids play at a school they don't attend in general though. Including home schoolers. This is what you call hair splitting. You can define it any way you wish but if a private school who offers football such as Highland Baptist were to allow kids from Assembly Christian two doors down to play on their team, you would all be screaming bloody murder cheater recruiter...... I feel it's the crux of the matter. Privates can remove kids, or turn away. Public's can't. Just as big as recruiting to me. Let's say a 2A school has 320 kids. If they could remove 40 "discipline problems" and 30 sped kids they would be down to 1A.
|
|
|
Post by indy on Oct 27, 2017 9:54:48 GMT -6
This is what you call hair splitting. You can define it any way you wish but if a private school who offers football such as Highland Baptist were to allow kids from Assembly Christian two doors down to play on their team, you would all be screaming bloody murder cheater recruiter...... I feel it's the crux of the matter. Privates can remove kids, or turn away. Public's can't. Just as big as recruiting to me. Let's say a 2A school has 320 kids. If they could remove 40 "discipline problems" and 30 sped kids they would be down to 1A. 40 kids X $7,000 = why you are delusional
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2017 10:15:17 GMT -6
I feel it's the crux of the matter. Privates can remove kids, or turn away. Public's can't. Just as big as recruiting to me. Let's say a 2A school has 320 kids. If they could remove 40 "discipline problems" and 30 sped kids they would be down to 1A. 40 kids X $7,000 = why you are delusional Who says they have $7000 to pay for private school? ? These are poor kids. Kids with one parent who lives off welfare. I'm not talking about middle class kids, with minor discipline problems. I fully understand you're not turning away "Johnny who talks too much in class". And the severe/profound kids cost WAY more than $7000 a year to take care of...and they count on the student numbers until they leave at 21 years of age.
|
|
|
Post by indy on Oct 27, 2017 10:25:17 GMT -6
40 kids X $7,000 = why you are delusional Who says they have $7000 to pay for private school? ? These are poor kids. Kids with one parent who lives off welfare. I'm not talking about middle class kids, with minor discipline problems. I fully understand you're not turning away "Johnny who talks too much in class". And the severe/profound kids cost WAY more than $7000 a year to take care of...and they count on the student numbers until they leave at 21 years of age. Put whatever $ number you want but a private or Catholic school isn't going to deny 1 student much less 40 students to stay down a class. It's just stupidity if you think that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2017 10:48:19 GMT -6
Who says they have $7000 to pay for private school? ? These are poor kids. Kids with one parent who lives off welfare. I'm not talking about middle class kids, with minor discipline problems. I fully understand you're not turning away "Johnny who talks too much in class". And the severe/profound kids cost WAY more than $7000 a year to take care of...and they count on the student numbers until they leave at 21 years of age. Put whatever $ number you want but a private or Catholic school isn't going to deny 1 student much less 40 students to stay down a class. It's just stupidity if you think that. So you're letting kids in free? Who would hurt the school culture? And you wouldn't have to do it to "stay down a class", that would be a byproduct. At this point we've probably left the "Football" area....probably a discussion for another place.
|
|
|
Post by indy on Oct 27, 2017 10:58:56 GMT -6
Put whatever $ number you want but a private or Catholic school isn't going to deny 1 student much less 40 students to stay down a class. It's just stupidity if you think that. So you're letting kids in free? Who would hurt the school culture? And you wouldn't have to do it to "stay down a class", that would be a byproduct. At this point we've probably left the "Football" area....probably a discussion for another place. You said a private school can deny enrollment to 40 students to drop down a class. I'm telling you that no Catholic school would do that. Enrollment = revenue = teachers and coaches getting paid
|
|
|
Post by publicgradprivatedad on Oct 27, 2017 11:02:14 GMT -6
I feel it's the crux of the matter. Privates can remove kids, or turn away. Public's can't. Just as big as recruiting to me. Let's say a 2A school has 320 kids. If they could remove 40 "discipline problems" and 30 sped kids they would be down to 1A. 40 kids X $7,000 = why you are delusional Actually he's saying 70 x $7,000 (40 disc + 30 sped = 70).
|
|
|
Post by publicgradprivatedad on Oct 27, 2017 11:08:53 GMT -6
Put whatever $ number you want but a private or Catholic school isn't going to deny 1 student much less 40 students to stay down a class. It's just stupidity if you think that. So you're letting kids in free? Who would hurt the school culture? And you wouldn't have to do it to "stay down a class", that would be a byproduct. At this point we've probably left the "Football" area....probably a discussion for another place. reaux, question for you. Do you really think many public schools are going to turn away any student? Remember the $$ follows the kid. This is one of the reasons the unions are so against charter schools, they are taking kids away from them and they are losing the money that follows the kid. What if Louisiana said this, parents here is $7000 (Indy's #) you can send your child to any school you wish, Public, Charter, or Private. The money follows the kid to whatever school the parent decides. Now the drawback for this decision is that you, the parent has to get the child to school, kinda like school of choice in Rapides Parish (Public Schools). If private schools got added into this equation do you think that they would turn kids away for any reason other than not enough room in the school?
|
|
|
Post by pinion on Oct 27, 2017 20:24:46 GMT -6
This is what you call hair splitting. You can define it any way you wish but if a private school who offers football such as Highland Baptist were to allow kids from Assembly Christian two doors down to play on their team, you would all be screaming bloody murder cheater recruiter...... I feel it's the crux of the matter. Privates can remove kids, or turn away. Public's can't. Just as big as recruiting to me. Let's say a 2A school has 320 kids. If they could remove 40 "discipline problems" and 30 sped kids they would be down to 1A. You say that like private schools are doing everything they can to play down in class. Most are trying to play up or at least stay where they are. the problem schools, the ones that started the whole mess, are both playing up as far as they can go. Public schools can remove kids if they want to. They just choose not to. For one, they don't want to be bothered with the paperwork (much like a cop letting you go instead of writing a ticket). For two, they want the money that comes from having more kids. More kids is more money. But let's just say I'm wrong on both of those: If public schools want to control their enrollment, all they need to do is have the local school board change the attendance zone (if they have one). This isn't about turning kids away or the ability to do so. This is about bringing kids in. This whole thing got started because kids were leaving public schools to go to private schools. Not because public schools can't turn kids away.
|
|