|
Post by indy on Dec 15, 2019 8:26:08 GMT -6
Now that the season is finished it still leaves us with an unfinished feeling. which team do you think is best in each class.
5A Rummel, I would have thought Acadiana before last nights game. 4A Karr. No brainer 3A St James. By default but no doubt 2A LCA but I would have paid to see them and Ferriday play 1A OCS but what great final it would have been with rivals and district mates OCS and OG squaring off for the second time.
|
|
|
Post by unbiasedobserver on Dec 15, 2019 8:35:59 GMT -6
Now that the season is finished it still leaves us with an unfinished feeling. which team do you think is best in each class. 5A Rummel, I would have thought Acadiana before last nights game. 4A Karr. No brainer 3A St James. By default but no doubt 2A LCA but I would have paid to see them and Ferriday play 1A OCS but what great final it would have been with rivals and district mates OCS and OG squaring off for the second time. Agree with everything here. But I would also pay to see a Karr-STM game. Think Karr wins but it would be fun to watch
|
|
|
Post by LATigerFan on Dec 15, 2019 9:25:49 GMT -6
Believe it or not I still think Catholic is the best team in 5A. I also think STM is better than Karr.
|
|
|
Post by retired on Dec 15, 2019 9:28:32 GMT -6
Believe it or not I still think Catholic is the best team in 5A. I also think STM is better than Karr. I was just about to ask Southplaq where Catholic BR fit in his end of season assessment since he felt they were better than Rummel even though Rummel came out on top in the end.
|
|
|
Post by indy on Dec 15, 2019 9:32:50 GMT -6
Believe it or not I still think Catholic is the best team in 5A. I also think STM is better than Karr. I thought Catholic too but they settled it on the field. I’m not sure STM could beat Karr or WE. That was some kind of talent on the field last night. STM losing to Westgate makes me believe they couldn’t beat Karr.
|
|
|
Post by Southplaq on Dec 15, 2019 9:56:34 GMT -6
Believe it or not I still think Catholic is the best team in 5A. I also think STM is better than Karr. I was just about to ask Southplaq where Catholic BR fit in his end of season assessment since he felt they were better than Rummel even though Rummel came out on top in the end. I think St. Thomas More is a better team than Catholic BR.
|
|
|
Post by retired on Dec 15, 2019 9:59:36 GMT -6
I was just about to ask Southplaq where Catholic BR fit in his end of season assessment since he felt they were better than Rummel even though Rummel came out on top in the end. I think St. Thomas More is a better team than Catholic BR. No I meant with regards to Rummel. You have Rummel listed first, but said that Catholic was the better team the night they played in Yuleman. Are you saying that you think Rummel is the better team, but that Catholic was just better that night, BUT Rummel still won the game?
|
|
|
Post by Southplaq on Dec 15, 2019 10:10:05 GMT -6
I think St. Thomas More is a better team than Catholic BR. No I meant with regards to Rummel. You have Rummel listed first, but said that Catholic was the better team the night they played in Yuleman. Are you saying that you think Rummel is the better team, but that Catholic was just better that night, BUT Rummel still won the game? Here you go over Analyzing things again, based off of a faulty assumption. You said I had Rummel listed above Catholic? Where is it do I have them listed above Catholic? Is it in the post where I SPECIFICALLY said, how do the 9 state champions rank? Catholic didn’t win state and therefore was never on the list to be ranked below Rummel. This is a topic asking a completely different question. So, do you want to ask your question under different circumstances without any faulty assumptions?
|
|
|
Post by Southplaq on Dec 15, 2019 10:14:04 GMT -6
I think St. Thomas More is a better team than Catholic BR. No I meant with regards to Rummel. You have Rummel listed first, but said that Catholic was the better team the night they played in Yuleman. Are you saying that you think Rummel is the better team, but that Catholic was just better that night, BUT Rummel still won the game? Do you want to ask, “Hey Southplaq, if you were ranking all teams in class 5A/Divison1, now that the season is over, do you think Rummel or Catholic is better?” That would be the question to ask, without bringing up some fictional list you created, just to try and purposely start yet another frivolous debate.
|
|
|
Post by retired on Dec 15, 2019 12:14:20 GMT -6
No I meant with regards to Rummel. You have Rummel listed first, but said that Catholic was the better team the night they played in Yuleman. Are you saying that you think Rummel is the better team, but that Catholic was just better that night, BUT Rummel still won the game? Here you go over Analyzing things again, based off of a faulty assumption. You said I had Rummel listed above Catholic? Where is it do I have them listed above Catholic? Is it in the post where I SPECIFICALLY said, how do the 9 state champions rank? Catholic didn’t win state and therefore was never on the list to be ranked below Rummel. This is a topic asking a completely different question. So, do you want to ask your question under different circumstances without any faulty assumptions? No Catholic isn't on that list. But STM is.. a team you just said was better than Catholic. Catholic, a team you stated last week was better than Rummel So, therefore STM should be better than Rummel no? Just looking for some consistency from you man.
|
|
|
Post by movethechains on Dec 15, 2019 12:34:48 GMT -6
STM-Catholic came down to the last play of the game...so did Curtis-Rummel...and Karr-WE, although it wasn't the last play of the game, came down to a two-point conversion also. I think on any given night out of these six and Acadiana also could be the other. The big schools didn't have any head and shoulders above all others teams this year like you have most years. St. James and LCA probably stood out in their classes, for the most part.
|
|
|
Post by lafan247 on Dec 15, 2019 12:40:42 GMT -6
Rummel is the real deal. Karr has been consistently dominant. Easton not too far behind. STM and Karr would be a nice game. St James went undefeated while playing up and beating the 5A runner up! They are legit This years Ferriday team would beat most 2A select teams in my opinion. LCA in my opinion should play up if the split wasn’t a factor. But a game against Ferriday or St James would be fun to watch. OCS and Oak Grove pretty much get their bragging right during the season when they play each other in district.
|
|
|
Post by ljswank on Dec 15, 2019 12:41:13 GMT -6
Now that the season is finished it still leaves us with an unfinished feeling. which team do you think is best in each class. 5A Rummel, I would have thought Acadiana before last nights game. 4A Karr. No brainer 3A St James. By default but no doubt 2A LCA but I would have paid to see them and Ferriday play 1A OCS but what great final it would have been with rivals and district mates OCS and OG squaring off for the second time. Attachment Deleted Still not so sure that Acadiana wouldn't beat Rummel, but certainly not with all the turnovers they had last night. Don't think Karr would beat STM though.
|
|
|
Post by ljswank on Dec 15, 2019 12:47:55 GMT -6
Believe it or not I still think Catholic is the best team in 5A. I also think STM is better than Karr. Attachment Deleted
|
|
|
Post by Southplaq on Dec 15, 2019 15:20:34 GMT -6
Here you go over Analyzing things again, based off of a faulty assumption. You said I had Rummel listed above Catholic? Where is it do I have them listed above Catholic? Is it in the post where I SPECIFICALLY said, how do the 9 state champions rank? Catholic didn’t win state and therefore was never on the list to be ranked below Rummel. This is a topic asking a completely different question. So, do you want to ask your question under different circumstances without any faulty assumptions? No Catholic isn't on that list. But STM is.. a team you just said was better than Catholic. Catholic, a team you stated last week was better than Rummel So, therefore STM should be better than Rummel no? Just looking for some consistency from you man. Let me ask you a question. If you were in danger and needed help, would you call Clark Kent or Superman?
|
|
|
Post by retired on Dec 15, 2019 15:26:44 GMT -6
No Catholic isn't on that list. But STM is.. a team you just said was better than Catholic. Catholic, a team you stated last week was better than Rummel So, therefore STM should be better than Rummel no? Just looking for some consistency from you man. Let me ask you a question. If you were in danger and needed help, would you call Clark Kent or Superman? ![](https://media1.giphy.com/media/26xBK3nOKnAcXksXS/giphy.gif)
|
|
|
Post by Southplaq on Dec 15, 2019 15:46:11 GMT -6
Here you go over Analyzing things again, based off of a faulty assumption. You said I had Rummel listed above Catholic? Where is it do I have them listed above Catholic? Is it in the post where I SPECIFICALLY said, how do the 9 state champions rank? Catholic didn’t win state and therefore was never on the list to be ranked below Rummel. This is a topic asking a completely different question. So, do you want to ask your question under different circumstances without any faulty assumptions? No Catholic isn't on that list. But STM is.. a team you just said was better than Catholic. Catholic, a team you stated last week was better than Rummel So, therefore STM should be better than Rummel no? Just looking for some consistency from you man. Consistency. Is that what you seek? You are seeking something that doesn’t exist. Who was better in 2017. Notre Dame or Catholic-New Iberia?
|
|
|
Post by retired on Dec 15, 2019 15:52:42 GMT -6
No Catholic isn't on that list. But STM is.. a team you just said was better than Catholic. Catholic, a team you stated last week was better than Rummel So, therefore STM should be better than Rummel no? Just looking for some consistency from you man. Consistency. Is that what you seek? You are seeking something that doesn’t exist. Who was better in 2017. Notre Dame or Catholic-New Iberia? I didn't see either one play, so I can't make that judgement. Consistency from you in your evaluations/posts. You seem to get around a lot, and are a passionate fan of the local/statewide HS game. So I thought I would ask your opinion. No biggie.
|
|
|
Post by Southplaq on Dec 15, 2019 16:01:42 GMT -6
Consistency. Is that what you seek? You are seeking something that doesn’t exist. Who was better in 2017. Notre Dame or Catholic-New Iberia? I didn't see either one play, so I can't make that judgement. Consistency from you in your evaluations/posts. You seem to get around a lot, and are a passionate fan of the local/statewide HS game. So I thought I would ask your opinion. No biggie. Who was better in 2012, LSU or Alabama (football)? Who would win a battle between Clark Kent and Superman? Surely you’ve seen those two guys
|
|
|
Post by Southplaq on Dec 15, 2019 16:35:33 GMT -6
Here you go over Analyzing things again, based off of a faulty assumption. You said I had Rummel listed above Catholic? Where is it do I have them listed above Catholic? Is it in the post where I SPECIFICALLY said, how do the 9 state champions rank? Catholic didn’t win state and therefore was never on the list to be ranked below Rummel. This is a topic asking a completely different question. So, do you want to ask your question under different circumstances without any faulty assumptions? No Catholic isn't on that list. But STM is.. a team you just said was better than Catholic. Catholic, a team you stated last week was better than Rummel So, therefore STM should be better than Rummel no? Just looking for some consistency from you man. You know, in all your pseudo-debating skills, you lack a key element, basic reading comprehension. So, let me break this down into the most simplest form that even a 4th grader would understand. If you keep your mouth closed long enough for your brain to actually absorb information, and go back and read my post about the Rummel and Catholic’s game you will clearly see that I said. Rummel won the game even though Catholic seem to be the better team that night, right? So, basically I said that even though Rummel Won, I felt Catholic was better team that night. Now, go back and read my comment about the Catholic and STM game. Again, I said that even though Catholic won, I felt STM was the better team that night. So, for the sake of this “consistency” you seek. In BOTH GAMES, i clearly stated that IMO, the team that won wasn’t the better team that night. That’s what I said in both cases, right? Isn’t that “consistency” Again, IMO, based off of the performances I seen for the state championship games, among the state champions, which has absolutely nothing to do with the any team who didn’t win state, I think Rummel would beat STM. I’m very sorry you can’t understand simple things when they are right in front of your face, but I’m not going to play your little mind games anymore. Obviously, you get off on that type of stuff. From now on, when you make a comment on any of my post in a ridiculous attempt to create a debate, I will answer with a ridiculous response concerning Clark Kent and Superman over and over until you get the point.
|
|
|
Post by thetruth14 on Dec 15, 2019 17:53:40 GMT -6
this will be a great offseason if southplaq and retired continue with this on the board
|
|
|
Post by retired on Dec 15, 2019 17:59:49 GMT -6
No Catholic isn't on that list. But STM is.. a team you just said was better than Catholic. Catholic, a team you stated last week was better than Rummel So, therefore STM should be better than Rummel no? Just looking for some consistency from you man. You know, in all your self-fabricated wisdom and pseudo-debating skills, you lack a key element, basic reading comprehension. So, let me break this down into the most simple form that even a 4th grader would understand. If you keep your mouth closed long enough for your brain to actually absorb information, and go back and read my post about the Rummel and Catholic’s game you will clearly see that I said. Rummel won the game even though Catholic seem to be the better team that night, right? So, basically I said that even though Rummel Won, I felt Catholic was better team that night. Now, go back and read my comment about the Catholic and STM game. Again, I said that even though Catholic won, I felt STM was the better team that night. So, for the sake of this “consistency” you seek. In BOTH GAMES, i clearly stated that IMO, the team that won wasn’t the better team that night. That’s what I said in both cases right? Isn’t that “consistency” Again, IMO, based off of the performances I seen for the state championship games, among the state champions, which has absolutely nothing to do with the any team who didn’t win state, I think Rummel would beat STM. I’m very sorry you can’t understand simple things when they are right in front of your face, but I’m not going to play your little mind games anymore. Obviously, you get off on that type of stuff. From now on, when you make a comment on any of my post in a ridiculous attempt to create a debate, I will answer with a ridiculous response concerning Clark Kent and Superman over and over until you get the point. By "mind games" you must mean the fact that this board is filled with people making stupid posts, and me calling them out on it? Sure, I will own that. For instance, comparing football games between TWO DIFFERENT OPPONENTS to Clark Kent and Superman and thinking that is a good analogy. Or calling a coaching decision dumb when you preferred a LESS LIKELY and LESS REWARDING strategy. Or where it all started... your ludicrous attempt to evaluate Slidell High without having ever seen them...LOL. Good luck and happy holiday season to you.
|
|
|
Post by Southplaq on Dec 15, 2019 18:20:44 GMT -6
this will be a great offseason if southplaq and retired continue with this on the board 🤣 It won’t be. If he wants to engage in a meaningful debate or discussion, then I am all for it, but when he makes a futile attempt to Use his twisted logic by purposely fabricating or twisting things you say, in order to make his point, then at that point the discussion is senseless and I will respond with a Superman/Clark Kent reply. I’ve come across people like this, where they purposely make the discussion so ridiculous, that you ignore them and quit responding and they feel like they “won” the discussion and get great satisfaction from their “moral victory”. It helps them sleep better at night and they can brag to their one friend how smart they are. Like I said, if you say the sky is blue, he will purposely jump on your post and say, “well, the sky is not exactly blue, I see white clouds too”. So, there you have it.
|
|
|
Post by Southplaq on Dec 15, 2019 18:22:54 GMT -6
You know, in all your self-fabricated wisdom and pseudo-debating skills, you lack a key element, basic reading comprehension. So, let me break this down into the most simple form that even a 4th grader would understand. If you keep your mouth closed long enough for your brain to actually absorb information, and go back and read my post about the Rummel and Catholic’s game you will clearly see that I said. Rummel won the game even though Catholic seem to be the better team that night, right? So, basically I said that even though Rummel Won, I felt Catholic was better team that night. Now, go back and read my comment about the Catholic and STM game. Again, I said that even though Catholic won, I felt STM was the better team that night. So, for the sake of this “consistency” you seek. In BOTH GAMES, i clearly stated that IMO, the team that won wasn’t the better team that night. That’s what I said in both cases right? Isn’t that “consistency” Again, IMO, based off of the performances I seen for the state championship games, among the state champions, which has absolutely nothing to do with the any team who didn’t win state, I think Rummel would beat STM. I’m very sorry you can’t understand simple things when they are right in front of your face, but I’m not going to play your little mind games anymore. Obviously, you get off on that type of stuff. From now on, when you make a comment on any of my post in a ridiculous attempt to create a debate, I will answer with a ridiculous response concerning Clark Kent and Superman over and over until you get the point. By "mind games" you must mean the fact that this board is filled with people making stupid posts, and me calling them out on it? Sure, I will own that. For instance, comparing football games between TWO DIFFERENT OPPONENTS to Clark Kent and Superman and thinking that is a good analogy. Or calling a coaching decision dumb when you preferred a LESS LIKELY and LESS REWARDING strategy. Or where it all started... your ludicrous attempt to evaluate Slidell High without having ever seen them...LOL. Good luck and happy holiday season to you. So, if you are in danger and you need help, are you going to call Clark Kent or Superman? You never answered my question. You never answered my question about LSU and Alabama either.
|
|
|
Post by Southplaq on Dec 16, 2019 4:47:00 GMT -6
You know, in all your self-fabricated wisdom and pseudo-debating skills, you lack a key element, basic reading comprehension. So, let me break this down into the most simple form that even a 4th grader would understand. If you keep your mouth closed long enough for your brain to actually absorb information, and go back and read my post about the Rummel and Catholic’s game you will clearly see that I said. Rummel won the game even though Catholic seem to be the better team that night, right? So, basically I said that even though Rummel Won, I felt Catholic was better team that night. Now, go back and read my comment about the Catholic and STM game. Again, I said that even though Catholic won, I felt STM was the better team that night. So, for the sake of this “consistency” you seek. In BOTH GAMES, i clearly stated that IMO, the team that won wasn’t the better team that night. That’s what I said in both cases right? Isn’t that “consistency” Again, IMO, based off of the performances I seen for the state championship games, among the state champions, which has absolutely nothing to do with the any team who didn’t win state, I think Rummel would beat STM. I’m very sorry you can’t understand simple things when they are right in front of your face, but I’m not going to play your little mind games anymore. Obviously, you get off on that type of stuff. From now on, when you make a comment on any of my post in a ridiculous attempt to create a debate, I will answer with a ridiculous response concerning Clark Kent and Superman over and over until you get the point. By "mind games" you must mean the fact that this board is filled with people making stupid posts, and me calling them out on it? Sure, I will own that. For instance, comparing football games between TWO DIFFERENT OPPONENTS to Clark Kent and Superman and thinking that is a good analogy. Or calling a coaching decision dumb when you preferred a LESS LIKELY and LESS REWARDING strategy. Or where it all started... your ludicrous attempt to evaluate Slidell High without having ever seen them...LOL. Good luck and happy holiday season to you. Oh you’re back on the Slidell thing. lol. Again, I’m sorry that you are mentally incapable of understanding simple things. How do to think all of these football expert do PRE-SEASON teams rankings in prep, college, and the NFL? Do you understand the definition of “pre-season”? It means before the season starts. So, they don’t actually get a chance to see all the teams play in an actual game at that point. They rank them based off of other factors, just like I did with Slidell. This is a very simple concept that has been accepted for decades. But according to the world of retired, this widely nationally accepted practice is “ludicrous”. I tell you man, the level of your childishness and Inability to grasp simple concepts is astounding. You should think about joining a Tiny-Twos forum where they can teach you the simple concept of putting square blocks in square holes, because this football forum seems to be way above your mental capabilities.
|
|
|
Post by unbiasedobserver on Dec 16, 2019 7:11:30 GMT -6
By "mind games" you must mean the fact that this board is filled with people making stupid posts, and me calling them out on it? Sure, I will own that. For instance, comparing football games between TWO DIFFERENT OPPONENTS to Clark Kent and Superman and thinking that is a good analogy. Or calling a coaching decision dumb when you preferred a LESS LIKELY and LESS REWARDING strategy. Or where it all started... your ludicrous attempt to evaluate Slidell High without having ever seen them...LOL. Good luck and happy holiday season to you. Oh you’re back on the Slidell thing. lol. Again, I’m sorry that you are mentally incapable of understanding simple things. How do to think all of these football expert do PRE-SEASON teams rankings in prep, college, and the NFL? Do you understand the definition of “pre-season”? It means before the season starts. So, they don’t actually get a chance to see all the teams play in an actual game at that point. They rank them based off of other factors, just like I did with Slidell. This is a very simple concept that has been accepted for decades. But according to the world of retired, this widely nationally accepted practice is “ludicrous”. I tell you man, the level of your childishness and Inability to grasp simple concepts is astounding. You should think about joining a Tiny-Twos forum where they can teach you the simple concept of putting square blocks in square holes, because this football forum seems to be way above your mental capabilities. This made me LOL
|
|
|
Post by retired on Jan 5, 2020 17:49:26 GMT -6
By "mind games" you must mean the fact that this board is filled with people making stupid posts, and me calling them out on it? Sure, I will own that. For instance, comparing football games between TWO DIFFERENT OPPONENTS to Clark Kent and Superman and thinking that is a good analogy. Or calling a coaching decision dumb when you preferred a LESS LIKELY and LESS REWARDING strategy. Or where it all started... your ludicrous attempt to evaluate Slidell High without having ever seen them...LOL. Good luck and happy holiday season to you. Oh you’re back on the Slidell thing. lol. Again, I’m sorry that you are mentally incapable of understanding simple things. How do to think all of these football expert do PRE-SEASON teams rankings in prep, college, and the NFL? Do you understand the definition of “pre-season”? It means before the season starts. So, they don’t actually get a chance to see all the teams play in an actual game at that point. They rank them based off of other factors, just like I did with Slidell. This is a very simple concept that has been accepted for decades. But according to the world of retired, this widely nationally accepted practice is “ludicrous”. I tell you man, the level of your childishness and Inability to grasp simple concepts is astounding. You should think about joining a Tiny-Twos forum where they can teach you the simple concept of putting square blocks in square holes, because this football forum seems to be way above your mental capabilities. Haven't logged in in a while, just saw this. The only thing I will say is you are consistent. Once again, an example of not thinking through the steps. Everything you type is 100% true, EXCEPT, you forget that in our debate regarding Slidell being "very good" (your term), You never saw them play. I did. The "widely nationally accepted practice" all goes out of the window once the games start ant people see teams play. So all of your attempts at mocking intelligence go out the window. Hope you had a good holiday. Predictions on LHSAA January meeting?
|
|