|
Post by chalmetteowl on Mar 8, 2016 11:57:46 GMT -6
well yeah, you're for giving them a reason to lie... No, I am asking for the truth. Simply put, the truth is, schools are for learning, not athletics. When certain schools attempt to make it about winning before education, OR use education as an incentive to enhance their athletic teams, that is wrong by rule according to the LHSAA handbook. The truth is, when you're sitting in the desk in the classroom, it's about learning. When you're on the field dressed out on Friday night, it's about athletics. The two can be mutually exclusive. I'm for systems that would remove high schools from the equation, as long as kids have the same kind of playing opportunities.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 8, 2016 12:09:22 GMT -6
So how do you remove high schools from the equation of high school football?
|
|
|
Post by chalmetteowl on Mar 8, 2016 12:16:53 GMT -6
So how do you remove high schools from the equation of high school football? make it all club teams for kids 14-18 years old and lease the infrastructure
|
|
|
Post by chalmetteowl on Mar 8, 2016 12:18:33 GMT -6
So how do you remove high schools from the equation of high school football? make it all club teams for kids 14-18 years old and lease the infrastructure. The money and costs can be worked out
|
|