Post by indy on Jun 6, 2016 19:44:30 GMT -6
So, according to you: If a school allows a kid to go to school there on someone else's dime, that's recruiting?
If that's what you're saying then, every public school is guilty of recruiting.
I'll say this again for the millionth time: I pay taxes to cover kids at public schools and no longer have kids attending public schools. I also fork over tuition for my remaining school aged child to attend a private school. I'm paying TWICE. Yes, I'm doing that by choice (if you really consider it that). But the fact remains that I am paying for kids to attend a school I have no interest in.
The first year I sent my son to a private school, I had to have help with the tuition. But it wasn't from the school. It was from an individual. That same individual is also paying for kids to attend public schools. And their kids are all grown and have kids of their own now. So they have no interest in public schools either.
I'm starting to get the idea that you don't understand how scholarships work at private schools. I don't know how it is everywhere, but I know around here that the schools are not just eating the cost of kids being there. People are putting that money there, not the school.
If you want to see how it would all work out, keep trying to make sure private schools leave the LHSAA.
2 leagues isn't going to end well for LHSAA schools.
Not sure now but a couple years ago, big firms did due diligence and tons of research on LHSAA policy ahead of a possible law suit, all this and the anticipated litigation was all done pro bono. I wander if any public school grads will step up and do the same on behalf of public schools? Any amount of prolonged litigation could bankrupt the LHSAA.,