|
Post by chalmetteowl on Jun 10, 2016 8:03:46 GMT -6
i propose that a rule be made that allows regular season non-district games indefinitely between all LHSAA members in good standing as of June 9th, 2016...
no matter whether some go to a new association or not, this protects games that the kids and local communities want to play.
any new schoools entering a new association wouldn't be allowed to schedule LHSAA teams...
|
|
|
Post by indy on Jun 10, 2016 8:07:59 GMT -6
i propose that a rule be made that allows regular season non-district games indefinitely between all LHSAA members in good standing as of June 9th, 2016... no matter whether some go to a new association or not, this protects games that the kids and local communities want to play. any new schoools entering a new association wouldn't be allowed to schedule LHSAA teams... Problem is a new organization will be out of sync with the LHSAA 's two year cycle. And you know and I know the same block of self serving principals that control the LHSAA will not let that happen. Sad
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 8:17:05 GMT -6
i propose that a rule be made that allows regular season non-district games indefinitely between all LHSAA members in good standing as of June 9th, 2016... no matter whether some go to a new association or not, this protects games that the kids and local communities want to play. any new schoools entering a new association wouldn't be allowed to schedule LHSAA teams... Problem is a new organization will be out of sync with the LHSAA 's two year cycle. And you know and I know the same block of self serving principals that control the LHSAA will not let that happen. Sad I think it would be in synch actually if they are planning to start 2017-2018
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 8:19:39 GMT -6
We have been told by a major private that they will not play us anymore because we voted for the split. If other privates feel the same way this might not be an issue.
|
|
|
Post by indy on Jun 10, 2016 8:22:18 GMT -6
Problem is a new organization will be out of sync with the LHSAA 's two year cycle. And you know and I know the same block of self serving principals that control the LHSAA will not let that happen. Sad I think it would be in synch actually if they are planning to start 2017-2018 If the LHSAA allows cross league play, maybe. If not, no. The new league will have to sync with neighboring states.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 8:24:16 GMT -6
I think it would be in synch actually if they are planning to start 2017-2018 If the LHSAA allows cross league play, maybe. If not, no. The new league will have to sync with neighboring states. That makes sense....so they could create a one year schedule next year, then synch up with the other states.
|
|
|
Post by indy on Jun 10, 2016 8:30:31 GMT -6
If the LHSAA allows cross league play, maybe. If not, no. The new league will have to sync with neighboring states. That makes sense....so they could create a one year schedule next year, then synch up with the other states. Probably finish a two year cycle, have a one year make shift, get organized season. Then start fresh after that.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 8:46:57 GMT -6
Okay, So the LHSAA just voted to have championships numbers that the championship sites say they cannot accommodate and voted in a 10 team "division". They don't give a damn about rivalries! They want a trophy! There will be no consideration to history, tradition, or rivalries! This is about trophies for coaches and nothing else.
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Jun 10, 2016 8:47:02 GMT -6
i propose that a rule be made that allows regular season non-district games indefinitely between all LHSAA members in good standing as of June 9th, 2016... no matter whether some go to a new association or not, this protects games that the kids and local communities want to play. any new schoools entering a new association wouldn't be allowed to schedule LHSAA teams... I'd definitely like to keep up the rivalries we have with White Castle, Brusly and East Iberville.
|
|
|
Post by chalmetteowl on Jun 10, 2016 10:39:23 GMT -6
the bottom line is that money talks... i know we didn't vote for the split in 2013 or back in January, so i doubt we voted for it Wednesday.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 12:51:28 GMT -6
i propose that a rule be made that allows regular season non-district games indefinitely between all LHSAA members in good standing as of June 9th, 2016... no matter whether some go to a new association or not, this protects games that the kids and local communities want to play. any new schoools entering a new association wouldn't be allowed to schedule LHSAA teams... I'd definitely like to keep up the rivalries we have with White Castle, Brusly and East Iberville. Best bet would be to stay in the LHSAA then, if that's really what's important to you.
|
|
|
Post by indy on Jun 10, 2016 13:15:39 GMT -6
I'd definitely like to keep up the rivalries we have with White Castle, Brusly and East Iberville. Best bet would be to stay in the LHSAA then, if that's really what's important to you. Then How long before the same block of principals vote split districts?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 13:17:03 GMT -6
Best bet would be to stay in the LHSAA then, if that's really what's important to you. Then How long before the same block of principals vote split districts? No reason for that really. Don't see it happening.
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Jun 10, 2016 13:20:32 GMT -6
I'd definitely like to keep up the rivalries we have with White Castle, Brusly and East Iberville. Best bet would be to stay in the LHSAA then, if that's really what's important to you. Not that important.
|
|
|
Post by Raven on Jun 10, 2016 13:22:44 GMT -6
Then How long before the same block of principals vote split districts? No reason for that really. Don't see it happening. So the "private school advantage" is ok for district championships, but not for playoffs? That pretty much confirms that this wasn't about any unfair competition, and was always about championships.
|
|
|
Post by indy on Jun 10, 2016 13:24:45 GMT -6
Then How long before the same block of principals vote split districts? No reason for that really. Don't see it happening. If you would have seen the last district meeting, and watched the coach from kinder make a fool of himself trying to push ND the other way you might not feel the same. All it takes is something small like that. If Many were put in Calvery district, how long? Same thing with the Cecelia now Breax Bridge coach, he all but cried not to be in a district with TC, and STM.
|
|
|
Post by iknownuthing on Jun 10, 2016 15:12:24 GMT -6
I think it would be in synch actually if they are planning to start 2017-2018 If the LHSAA allows cross league play, maybe. If not, no. The new league will have to sync with neighboring states. You could go with annual scheduling and not worry about syncing with anyone. If someone wants a 2 year contract, no problem give them one by school. If some one wants a 10 year contract no problem, if its just to fill a whole next year great. The idea of the 2 year contract is because the LHSAA reclassifies every two years. If a new association does not set up districts, you can schedule pretty much as you wish. I would think that a new group would organize around either a division or a class by size, stipulate a requirement that you play X number of games in class and then take your power rating for the playoffs.
|
|
|
Post by indy on Jun 10, 2016 15:21:25 GMT -6
If the LHSAA allows cross league play, maybe. If not, no. The new league will have to sync with neighboring states. You could go with annual scheduling and not worry about syncing with anyone. If someone wants a 2 year contract, no problem give them one by school. If some one wants a 10 year contract no problem, if its just to fill a whole next year great. The idea of the 2 year contract is because the LHSAA reclassifies every two years. If a new association does not set up districts, you can schedule pretty much as you wish. I would think that a new group would organize around either a division or a class by size, stipulate a requirement that you play X number of games in class and then take your power rating for the playoffs. Two years gives you a home and away. Coaches like this. Scheduling is a . A new league will be similar to the sec. A commissioner will make the majority of your schedule. This will help our friends above I-10, you may have 2-3,long road games. and each team will have 3-4 games to schedule themselves.
|
|
|
Post by iknownuthing on Jun 10, 2016 15:57:14 GMT -6
You could go with annual scheduling and not worry about syncing with anyone. If someone wants a 2 year contract, no problem give them one by school. If some one wants a 10 year contract no problem, if its just to fill a whole next year great. The idea of the 2 year contract is because the LHSAA reclassifies every two years. If a new association does not set up districts, you can schedule pretty much as you wish. I would think that a new group would organize around either a division or a class by size, stipulate a requirement that you play X number of games in class and then take your power rating for the playoffs. Two years gives you a home and away. Coaches like this. Scheduling is a . A new league will be similar to the sec. A commissioner will make the majority of your schedule. This will help our friends above I-10, you may have 2-3,long road games. and each team will have 3-4 games to schedule themselves. I like that idea, set the majority of the schedule within class or division by a commissar not by the school. 6 or 7 games, then you have freedom to schedule how you would like for the remaining 3 or 4. Commissar said, ND vs STM ND vs TCHS, ND vs St. Louis, ND vs Catholic BR, ND vs Brother Martin, ND vs Calvary, ND vs Menard, School chooses ND vs CHNI, ND vs Evangel, ND vs ED White STM vs ND STM vs Catholic BR, STM vs Rummel, STM vs St. Michaels, STM vs TCHS, STM vs St. Pauls, STM vs Shaw School chooses STM vs Evangel, STM vs Jesuit, STM vs Vandebilt Catholic
|
|
|
Post by indy on Jun 10, 2016 16:25:26 GMT -6
Two years gives you a home and away. Coaches like this. Scheduling is a . A new league will be similar to the sec. A commissioner will make the majority of your schedule. This will help our friends above I-10, you may have 2-3,long road games. and each team will have 3-4 games to schedule themselves. I like that idea, set the majority of the schedule within class or division by a commissar not by the school. 6 or 7 games, then you have freedom to schedule how you would like for the remaining 3 or 4. Commissar said, ND vs STM ND vs TCHS, ND vs St. Louis, ND vs Catholic BR, ND vs Brother Martin, ND vs Calvary, ND vs Menard, School chooses ND vs CHNI, ND vs Evangel, ND vs ED White STM vs ND STM vs Catholic BR, STM vs Rummel, STM vs St. Michaels, STM vs TCHS, STM vs St. Pauls, STM vs Shaw School chooses STM vs Evangel, STM vs Jesuit, STM vs Vandebilt Catholic There will probably be 11 week regular seasons
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 18:53:17 GMT -6
No reason for that really. Don't see it happening. If you would have seen the last district meeting, and watched the coach from kinder make a fool of himself trying to push ND the other way you might not feel the same. All it takes is something small like that. If Many were put in Calvery district, how long? Same thing with the Cecelia now Breax Bridge coach, he all but cried not to be in a district with TC, and STM. I'm going to comment on this, because it's nothing like you are portraying. When I first saw the district, I actually laughed. I, like most, thought it was pretty dumb. Since when has Notre dame ever been in a district with kinder, dequincy, and vinton? I can see Notre dame playing kinder, but playing the other 2 would be ridiculous! I can see Notre dame playing welsh and mamou as well. It made no logistical sense! Another thing, no district wants a 7 team district. They want a 6 or 8 team district. Since u know so much, did coach Fuselier call coach cook and ask him his opinion? The answer is yes! They spoke about the issue and coach cook didn't really care, but he preferred to be in the Acadiana area district. These meetings are quite common, and everyone has a voice in the matter. The state knew coach Fuselier was correct. If not, Notre dame would have been placed in the district with kinder. I just thought I'd set the record straight and also give the full version of the story.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 18:53:37 GMT -6
No reason for that really. Don't see it happening. If you would have seen the last district meeting, and watched the coach from kinder make a fool of himself trying to push ND the other way you might not feel the same. All it takes is something small like that. If Many were put in Calvery district, how long? Same thing with the Cecelia now Breax Bridge coach, he all but cried not to be in a district with TC, and STM. I'm going to comment on this, because it's nothing like you are portraying. When I first saw the district, I actually laughed. I, like most, thought it was pretty dumb. Since when has Notre dame ever been in a district with kinder, dequincy, and vinton? I can see Notre dame playing kinder, but playing the other 2 would be ridiculous! I can see Notre dame playing welsh and mamou as well. It made no logistical sense! Another thing, no district wants a 7 team district. They want a 6 or 8 team district. Since u know so much, did coach Fuselier call coach cook and ask him his opinion? The answer is yes! They spoke about the issue and coach cook didn't really care, but he preferred to be in the Acadiana area district. These meetings are quite common, and everyone has a voice in the matter. The state knew coach Fuselier was correct. If not, Notre dame would have been placed in the district with kinder. I just thought I'd set the record straight and also give the full version of the story.
|
|
|
Post by indy on Jun 10, 2016 19:09:47 GMT -6
If you would have seen the last district meeting, and watched the coach from kinder make a fool of himself trying to push ND the other way you might not feel the same. All it takes is something small like that. If Many were put in Calvery district, how long? Same thing with the Cecelia now Breax Bridge coach, he all but cried not to be in a district with TC, and STM. I'm going to comment on this, because it's nothing like you are portraying. When I first saw the district, I actually laughed. I, like most, thought it was pretty dumb. Since when has Notre dame ever been in a district with kinder, dequincy, and vinton? I can see Notre dame playing kinder, but playing the other 2 would be ridiculous! I can see Notre dame playing welsh and mamou as well. It made no logistical sense! Another thing, no district wants a 7 team district. They want a 6 or 8 team district. Since u know so much, did coach Fuselier call coach cook and ask him his opinion? The answer is yes! They spoke about the issue and coach cook didn't really care, but he preferred to be in the Acadiana area district. These meetings are quite common, and everyone has a voice in the matter. The state knew coach Fuselier was correct. If not, Notre dame would have been placed in the district with kinder. I just thought I'd set the record straight and also give the full version of the story. Google and Read the live tweets from the advocate. Indest made the same case that we belonged with kinder. He said he would argue it to death. Kinder lobbied hard to get sacred Heart, that's 7 also. He did call cook and asked him to stay neutral. Louie never said anything one way or another. ND over iits 50 year history's has bounced back from east to west in 3a and 2a.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 19:49:27 GMT -6
I'm going to comment on this, because it's nothing like you are portraying. When I first saw the district, I actually laughed. I, like most, thought it was pretty dumb. Since when has Notre dame ever been in a district with kinder, dequincy, and vinton? I can see Notre dame playing kinder, but playing the other 2 would be ridiculous! I can see Notre dame playing welsh and mamou as well. It made no logistical sense! Another thing, no district wants a 7 team district. They want a 6 or 8 team district. Since u know so much, did coach Fuselier call coach cook and ask him his opinion? The answer is yes! They spoke about the issue and coach cook didn't really care, but he preferred to be in the Acadiana area district. These meetings are quite common, and everyone has a voice in the matter. The state knew coach Fuselier was correct. If not, Notre dame would have been placed in the district with kinder. I just thought I'd set the record straight and also give the full version of the story. Google and Read the live tweets from the advocate. Indest made the same case that we belonged with kinder. He said he would argue it to death. Kinder lobbied hard to get sacred Heart, that's 7 also. He did call cook and asked him to stay neutral. Louie never said anything one way or another. ND over iits 50 year history's has bounced back from east to west in 3a and 2a. When have they ever been in a district with kinder, vinton, and dequincy. No! They didn't try to get sacred heart! Sacred heart wanted to be in the district they are currently in. Kinder wanted 6 or 8. Personally, I would have moved mamou in a district with oakdale and sacred heart.
|
|
|
Post by indy on Jun 10, 2016 20:03:30 GMT -6
Google and Read the live tweets from the advocate. Indest made the same case that we belonged with kinder. He said he would argue it to death. Kinder lobbied hard to get sacred Heart, that's 7 also. He did call cook and asked him to stay neutral. Louie never said anything one way or another. ND over iits 50 year history's has bounced back from east to west in 3a and 2a. When have they ever been in a district with kinder, vinton, and dequincy. No! They didn't try to get sacred heart! Sacred heart wanted to be in the district they are currently in. Kinder wanted 6 or 8. Personally, I would have moved mamou in a district with oakdale and sacred heart. Nd has been in 3a the last 18 years bouncing back and fourth from east to west. The first 30 they also bounced and was with vinton welsh dequincy lake Auther plenty of times. True they lobbied for sacred heart and momou. So sacred heart is a better geographical fit than ND? Geez,
|
|
|
Post by 1stdown on Jun 10, 2016 21:16:50 GMT -6
Kinder has always been in districts to its north, like rosepine, pickering, south beau, oakdale. Those are way farther than nd but thats where we always played.I really dont know why this bothers you so much, get over it. We don't have any tradition with anyone that far east. We do play opelusas catholic in the fall for preseason. We played them when I was in high school during regular season for a few years but never went to nd, so it doesnt make sense to play nd. Call coach fuse and tell him this if it makes u lose sleep at night. Enough crying over something that happened 2 years ago.
|
|
|
Post by pioneerforlife on Jun 10, 2016 21:29:20 GMT -6
We have been told by a major private that they will not play us anymore because we voted for the split. If other privates feel the same way this might not be an issue. Who? And whats ur school?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 21:42:41 GMT -6
Best bet would be to stay in the LHSAA then, if that's really what's important to you. Not that important. i agree, but it might be for some.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 21:46:23 GMT -6
When have they ever been in a district with kinder, vinton, and dequincy. No! They didn't try to get sacred heart! Sacred heart wanted to be in the district they are currently in. Kinder wanted 6 or 8. Personally, I would have moved mamou in a district with oakdale and sacred heart. Nd has been in 3a the last 18 years bouncing back and fourth from east to west. The first 30 they also bounced and was with vinton welsh dequincy lake Auther plenty of times. True they lobbied for sacred heart and momou. So sacred heart is a better geographical fit than ND? Geez, [br Coach cook never spoke out publicly.... He told coach Fuselier that he could put his name on the proposal. He agreed with it. Kinder said if we get Notre dame, we want sacred heart as well. We wanted a 6 or 8 team district. Sacred heart didn't want to come to our district. What are these years u speak of that Notre dame was in a district with dequincy, vinton, and kinder? I'll be waiting on this one!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jun 10, 2016 21:56:42 GMT -6
Nd has been in 3a the last 18 years bouncing back and fourth from east to west. The first 30 they also bounced and was with vinton welsh dequincy lake Auther plenty of times. True they lobbied for sacred heart and momou. So sacred heart is a better geographical fit than ND? Geez, [br Coach cook never spoke out publicly.... He told coach Fuselier that he could put his name on the proposal. He agreed with it. Kinder said if we get Notre dame, we want sacred heart as well. We wanted a 6 or 8 team district. Sacred heart didn't want to come to our district. What are these years u speak of that Notre dame was in a district with dequincy, vinton, and kinder? I'll be waiting on this one! I'll agree on welsh and lake Arthur. Coach cook is very well respected by kinder and the rest of the state. I'd like to get that in also. I don't appreciate the fact that Coach Fuselier is being cut down when the true facts aren't being stated. Notre dame is a fine program. Clearly one of the best in the state! A coach like Coach Cook could easily help relations with the public schools. Bonine would be wise to reach out to coaches like coach cook and coach Fuselier to resolve this issue. Forming the task force was a horrible idea. He left far to many schools out. It pissed those schools off. It made them feel like they had no voice. DOES MY PREVIOUS STATEMENT SOUND FAMILIAR?? I don't think it's over. I'd take a shot in January.
|
|